Along the way, she has about a decade and a half of data analysis work under her belt and currently works as a blog coordinator for a high-end wedding blog and also as a blogger for hire (topics include diverse subjects like ad retargeting but also the nursing job market), and has a shingle out to work on social media presence, with a focus on independent authors as she is also a published science fiction author. Plus, she has been a community manager for a large Q & A website since 2002, which is before that existed as a job title.
She was raised on Long Island so, when she is riled up, the accent gallops back out and she can sound like Fran Drescher with a law degree. She lives in Boston with her husband of over 20 years and more computers than they need.
She can always be bribed with pie.
Latest posts by Janet Gershen-Siegel (see all)
- Semantic Shenanigans Episode 16 – Wakanda Driving Privileges - May 13, 2018
- Semantic Shenanigans Episode 15 – Coldplay Justice - January 27, 2018
- Indie Writer Woes – Protect Yourselves! - November 17, 2017
Axanar Plaintiffs Objection to Defense SJ Motion
So I have the plaintiffs objection to the defense’s summary judgment motion. This is another one of the documents filed with the court on November 29, 2016. However, the documents may have been filed out of order in terms of who responded to whom. Instead of trying to sort that out, I will post blogs in the documents’ numerical filing order with the court. Because that’s just easier for me, folks.
Exhibits Supporting Plaintiffs Objection
Because 46 exhibits exist on the court page (and several more only exist as filed under seal), I will limit what I upload. Therefore, if you want an exhibit document, please use the Contact page and ask! And we will figure something out, okay?
First of all, the following exhibits only exist as filed under seal: A, B, D, K, N, P, V, W, AA, JJ, KK, LL, NN, PP, SS, CCC, FFF, III, KKK, and LLL.
The following exhibits are identical to the same-lettered exhibits in the plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment: C (a few added pages), E, F, G, H, I, J, L, M, O, Q, R, S, T, U, X, Y, Z, BB, CC, DD, EE, FF, GG, HH, II, MM, OO, QQ, RR, TT, UU, VV, WW, XX, YY, ZZ, AAA, and BBB.
And now for the new exhibits.
First of all, this exhibit consists of CBS’s response to interrogatories, set 1.
Virtually identical to exhibit DDD, this exhibit consists of Paramount’s response to interrogatories, set 1.
In addition, this exhibit consists of a Gossett-Peters email exchange. And on June 29, 2014, Peters wrote:
First, we blew through all the money we had.
Furthermore, this exhibit consists of about one-half of the Kickstarter pages.
In addition, this exhibit consists of the second half of the Kickstarter pages.
Finally, this exhibit consists of an email exchange between the attorneys regarding expert depositions.