Along the way, she has about a decade and a half of data analysis work under her belt and currently works as a blog coordinator for a high-end wedding blog and also as a blogger for hire (topics include diverse subjects like ad retargeting but also the nursing job market), and has a shingle out to work on social media presence, with a focus on independent authors as she is also a published science fiction author. Plus, she has been a community manager for a large Q & A website since 2002, which is before that existed as a job title.
She was raised on Long Island so, when she is riled up, the accent gallops back out and she can sound like Fran Drescher with a law degree. She lives in Boston with her husband of over 20 years and more computers than they need.
She can always be bribed with pie.
Latest posts by Janet Gershen-Siegel (see all)
- Semantic Shenanigans Episode 16 – Wakanda Driving Privileges - May 13, 2018
- Semantic Shenanigans Episode 15 – Coldplay Justice - January 27, 2018
- Indie Writer Woes – Protect Yourselves! - November 17, 2017
Axanar Defense Response to Plaintiffs’ Request for Ex Parte Relief
So the Axanar Defense Response came in quickly (the parties were under a strict deadline!). And as expected, the response drags on but defense had to do it right quick. So as always, we’ll go through it line by line. It’s huge – sorry! Furthermore, this post is the sequel to the plaintiffs’ ex parte application for an order and the David Grossman declaration and exhibits.
Axanar Defense Response
First of all, as always, we start with a good old cover page.
And herein defense says their opponents did not engage in a meaningful dialogue regarding discovery (see the Grossman exhibits for an opposing viewpoint).
So when we get to this page (the discussion continues from the previous page, supra), defense brings up the question about de-designating the Peters Quicken documents regarding the Prelude and Axanar financials. Ranahan claims:
How Defendants specifically spent funds that were donated by
enthusiastic fans for Axanar projects—one of which is not even complete because this
lawsuit interrupted it—has no bearing on any issue in this case. Plaintiffs obviously
have no standing to scrutinize or complain about money not going to the fan film they
are trying to shut down.
With all due respect to the defense attorney, she’s wrong. The financials go directly to personal financial benefit, which is what the plaintiffs are suing about in the first place.
Finally, on this page, defense counsel draws her conclusion.